|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think so!
Jan 3, 2005
my only antaganists.if it is for proper discourse,fine.if on the other hand you're intention is to demean me here,well others at the site should be alerted to your motives and methods before mine.they are the ones that need fair warning of your intentions.
my only antaganists I don?’t think so!
THO
Dec 28, 2004
IS A LOOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tho Is Nitwit
Dec 29, 2004
Tho, this self appointed community voice over these links is a proverbial nitwit exposing dung posts. Give it a rest, jerk. Your attitude is almighty and your logic similarly baseless. Clowns like you obviously have nothing else to do but preach to an empty pew. I say go to WalMart and get a job as a greeter for your comments are far too frequent, too simple and not worth the time to read. That's my read. Yes, you're entitled to opinion, but on every issue? Give it a rest imbecile.
-By Bert
what a twerp
Dec 29, 2004
guess who
-By Anonymous
tho
Dec 29, 2004
is townie in disguise. thought you folks realized that.
-By Anonymous
how does he do it
Dec 29, 2004
and keep from being lynched?
in colonial times Braintree had an village idiot or two,they survived by
being pathetic and much in need of mercy.
well i guess nothing has really changed.
-By Anonymous
tis better to be
Jan 2, 2005
insulted than to be ignored.
-By Anonymous
-By Anonymous
By THO
|
|
|
|
|
|
this time its TMM1's fault.
6:25 pm
make sure you thank him.
give it time they will
Jan 3, 2005
when they get to know you!ask TMM1
-By Anonymous
By THO
|
|
|
this can go on & on.your choice
Good Question, THO
Jan 3, 2005
Previously I asked a question re: the split in percentage of budget per dept.,
in an attempt to reach the same goal. I do not think our school depts. percentage is so out of line, I do question how their share is allocated simply because I do not know how it is apportioned. We must realize that they are under certain mandates that affect their budget considerably. Where I find fault with our system is the negotiating side of contractual issues. At somepoint a system of step-raises was initiated. Now anyone who stays in the system receives an approximately 3% raise per year, automatically, for enhanced knowledge I presume. On top of that 3% increase in salary, they negotiate for an additional raise per year. So in affect, we are giving our employees a minimum of 4% per year. How can our budget sustain this expense? I know I sound like a broken record, but no one will humor me with an answer and I feel this is an important question: How much of our budget is allocated for salaries and contractual perks (clothes allowances, cleaning bills, etc.)If we knew this then maybe we could determine if we, as a community of 34K citizens, are overextended in this area; if so we could work on correcting the problem and possibly free up some cash for infrastructure. I think we have something like an $80mil. budget; that means we are spending about $2,353. per individual citizen to serve and protect; is that reasonable, I don't know.
-By money matter
By THO
|
|
|
playing both sides.again
a compliment/sentiment mixture
Jan 2, 2005
bert leave our idiot alone.
Dec 31, 2004
who do you think you are you dope.
you haven't done a days work for your bountious pay in your entiry miserable life.our fool drools along happily keeping up a constant background noise.
I admit he is a major pain on occasion but by enlarge his namechanging of late
shows some promise.he is ours,GOD help us.buzz off whe already have a fool and don't need you.
-By Anonymous
By THO
|
