Circle C Neighbors

Is SOB = BOD ?


Oop! I must have made a careless mistake. I thought SOB is the synonym of BOD.

Pardon me! ENGLISH is my second language.

Get a Life

I'm not a Mormon. I'm just talking common sense. You two know what SOB stands for in the common venacular, so you're not fooling anyone. Of course, anyone with basic common decency wouldn't try to win a community debate by using amatuerish tactics such as name calling, threats, or inflammatory statements.
And, by the way, I know some very nice Mormon families who live in Circle C. They help their neighbors and are good decent human beings.

Language everywhere

Even though I agree about cursing on this site, you got to be joking in this day & age!

Kids come home after school and hear slang words & cursing words that I NEVER HEARD!

Oh, BTW, have any of you parents watched MTV! Humping & grinding...is this any better then a ''bad word'' And the clothes, I grew up in the 70's THANK GOD, I thought we were liberal! An acrohyn like SOB. A bitch is a female dog or a fox!

Mark, lets be Neighborly ;)

Mark, again relax. I ment no offense to you. You and I are probably more alike than you think. But thinking the worst (about a post or a person) is just a mistake. I really thought and still think SOB stands for Squatters of the Board, no joke.

Here's my 2 cents worth, let's see if we agree.

Neighborly: Being Mormon would be a good thing. How can that be a cut down. Again, don't think negative. I'd say a Mormon would be more neighborly than a non-Mormon. But at the same time, one sure doesn't need to go to church to be a great person.

Not Neighborly: Giving (without a sealed bid process) Bradley's people all the contracts. And making sure Bartletts/Bradleys land south of Hwy 45 increases in value (by tens of millions of dollars at the expense of the safety of this neighborhood).

Neighborly: Being factual.

Not Neighborly: Telling someone to get a life.

Not Neighborly: A ''President'' misdirecting 7,000 residents with a letter...here's one for example from March 14, 2003. O'Reilly was APPEARING to address the Escarpment Extension issue of Bartlett having Ownership/Interests in land south of Hwy 45. The issue was that the extension would connect all the land Bartlett/Bradley own South of 45 and increase it's value. Again, SOUTH of 45...but look carefully at how he structures his sentences...Tricky and Not Neighborly::

''The activists are also claiming that current CCHOA V-President, Steve Bartlett wants the extension because he owns land on the southern side. Steve does not own any land in Circle C Ranch.'' - Jim O'Reilly

Simple question Mark. Do you support O'Reilly's tricky and not so neighborly behavior? Can anyone?