Hi, Tony:
It's my understanding that the Covenants freely provide for reasonable street-parking in the event of extraneous visits paid by friends and family, particularly on those occasions when company arrives for "Super Bowl Sunday," Christmas, Thanksgiving, the Fourth of July--and other special holidays or necessary layovers. (Thus the inclusion of a three-day parking interval as written into the neighborhood contract.) However, it should not be misconstrued, as it has apparently been misconstrued by at least one neighbor, that the three-day parking limitation is indeed an act loosely designed to allow a three-car family to freely rotate their vehicles as they see fit, or without genuine right or reason. In a hypothetical situation, a Fayetteville court judge will likely accurately interpret the good intentions implicit in our Covenants, and subsequently rule that just such an automobile rotation--indeed practiced flagrantly or routinely, without regard for the concerns of neighbors--is in fact a violation and breach of faith as implicit in the contract, and worthy of monetary fine.
In the end, it seems that reasonable folk would happily seek to abide in the rule, and opt for full usage of their driveways--as opposed to the public street. With the inclusions of street signs, it's likely that local police and municipal courts will thereby be in a position to effectively correct a problem which should never have arisen to begin with. Collective neighborhood cooperation is the key to a safe and aesthetically-pleasing living environment within our neighborhood, and had we enjoyed such cooperation from point-one, street signs would not have been necessary, sorry to say. My hat is off to those who've worked hard to solve this ongoing problem.
--mbl