Speed bumps were briefly discussed at the annual meeting last night (October 28) and I would like to state that I'm opposed to them. Perhaps they were voted on in the past and I wasn't present, but I'd still like to voice my opinion.
I live on a long straight stretch of Bayview Parkway (an ideal place to speed) and I don't believe speeding is a problem. I'll admit, when you're standing on the side of the road and someone drives by at 25 mph (the posted speed limit) it seems like they're going 40-45 mph. I know because my wife and I did an experiment a few months ago, where she drove by at 25 mph while I watched from the sidewalk.
A car traveling 25 mph would also appear to be speeding to those people who choose to walk in the street instead of on the sidewalk.
But please, before we move forward with speed bumps, let's be sure speeding is really a problem. To anyone who claims it is, please provide some data to back up your claim (e.g., number of speeding tickets written over a six to 12 month period). Opinions and feelings that speeding is a problem do not qualify as data and are not sufficient reasons to add speed bumps.
Michelle Corless stated last night that speed bumps are still at least a few years away, and I'm very happy about that.
PP