More On The FAA's Airport ''Noise Map'' Scam: I was glad to get some questions from Howard Beckman about airport noise maps as it is of great interest to me. For example, why aren't ALL airports required to have noise maps made?
Are the five-year ''projected'' airport noise maps resubmitted and updated every five years? Does anybody check in five years if the ''projections'' were accurate? Why do airports, like New York's JFK and LaGuardia Airports, refuse to be part of the Part 150 program and lose MILLIONS in federal soundproofing money? Perhaps the New York City airports are afraid that even the corrupt, computer ''projection'' methodology the FAA mandates for noise map preparation will expose the local, politically-influenced routing
discrimination that corrupt Port Authority of New York and New Jersey uses. Airports
''Participating In Part 150 Program:''
Checklist Of Requirements
The FAA's Office of Energy The Environment Homepage
FAA's Air Pollution ''Emission's'' Analysis: It will come as a surprise to no one I'm sure that the FAA liars analyze aviation air pollution the same way they do noise, by computer projection rather than actual on-site monitoring.
According to the FAA it is designed as a ''complex source microcomputer model
to assess the air quality impacts of proposed airport development projects.''
The FAA's motto seems to be ''why be simple when you can be complex and confusing to the public'' They plan to issue a final report in 2005!!!
Editor's note: I wonder how many people will be dead from airport poisons by that time? Read more on it at: FAA site or
EDMS .