Still Anonymous


Who is antb, valleyviewer, and new2the view. I know and you know that you will not tell. That means they are ''anonymous.''

The reason Watkins won't post is probably his lawyer has told him not to, after what he posted before the election. He is a liar.

Seeing Is Believing


I have been back to Valleyview. I saw how the Village looks. And I have read what has been posted on this site.

The complaints about the police and Watkins is still mayor.

I think that says it all.

They Are....

They are my neighbors. They are residents of the Village. They have been placing friendly and courteous postings.

They have asked tough, but fair questions. They have not attacked anyone, though one did make a reference about smoke up somewhere.

Why do you need to know their names Ms. White? They are identified by their usernames and if need be can be identified if they place threatening or slanderous statements online.

Before there were a lot of people posting anonymously and you could not tell who had posted something. If in the past the same person had posted anonymously and their username had been displayed you could see who was making what claims. It was not possible to quickly identify someone, though it could have been done. They are not ''anonymous''.

Reason Mr. Watkins does not post is because he does not have the ability to post. He does not have an internet connection.

What Is There To Believe?

Ms. White wrote:
''Andy said it was Dodge City. Don't you believe the former police chief?''

I believe that the former Police Chief has an opinion that it would be for him to discuss it.

I do not see Valleyview as Dodge City. What is there to believe or not? Because one person says so it makes it so.

Ms. White wrote:
''The people who voted for Watkins are still defending him.''

Would that be the 66% of the people that voted in the last election and felt that he was the best person for the job based on the candidates from which they had to choose?

What exactly are they defending him from?