It seems to me that for the association to say people must get a variance to roof their house or other things ignores the fact that we lost on this issue in the Ken Adams affair. We were unable to require any action at all regarding his ''tool shed'' which is clearly visable from the street. All he did was plead ''No restrictions apply'' because when the first ten years was up, Shadow Mountain homeowners voted no. We did not renew our restrictive covenants. Have we since then passed some new ones? I don't think so. Why, then, cause unknowing homeowners to comply with nonexistant covenants? I don't understand. Please enlighten me.
Jeff Krumme
Jeff Krumme