Airport extension ( Follow Up)

Posted in: Historic Old Northeast
  • Stock
  • shore4
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 48 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
Runway into bay at Albert Whitted? Not likely

That was one recommendation by a consultant. More options may be forthcoming.
By JON WILSON

?¿½ St. Petersburg Times, published October 15, 2000


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ST. PETERSBURG -- The committee looking at Albert Whitted Airport's future isn't likely to recommend runway extensions into Tampa Bay.

An extension of up to 1,720 feet into Tampa Bay would produce a 5,350-foot runway, big enough to handle business jets. That was one of the concepts a consultant presented to the committee a few weeks ago.

But the idea didn't fly with every committee member, airport director M.O. Burgess said last week.

''There was some concern raised by several individuals,'' Burgess said.

More discussion with the consultant, LPA Group of Orlando, is scheduled and more options may be forthcoming. A public meeting about the airport probably will be scheduled before Thanksgiving, said Burgess. The City Council will have a chance to contemplate any recommendations.

The consultant originally presented four concepts, including several that discussed runway extensions and one that focused on a ''no-build solution'' that would make almost no changes at the airport.

A 5,350-foot runway is ''possible but not realistic,'' Burgess said. For one thing, it would require giving up a taxiway, ''giving up land for the existing facility,'' Burgess said.

''We have very limited area in which to do that,'' Burgess said.

Albert Whitted is about 17 acres.

As is, it has an economic impact of about $25-million yearly in goods, services and salaries, Burgess said.

''I don't know the public as a whole really has an appreciation of what the airport is to the community,'' he said.

air noise

I certainly hope that the ''no build solution'' is chosen. Has anyone else observed the increase in noise from planes since we are in our dry weather pattern? The increase is substantial in my opinion and I would oppose anything which would cause more air traffic over this residential area.

Burgess' observation that the public has no real appreciation for the economic impact of the airport is probably true. However, the reality is that the airport is used by a privleged few and it occupies precious waterfront land which should be available to all. Economics is too often the driving force behind bureaucratic decisions, rather than quality of life for the majority.

By Louis D.
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow