Hello,
As promised, I am starting a topic on the increased sprinkler costs. This is a significant increase, and we are interested to see if people would still like us to proceed. We will have another election as I noted in June, but if we find that the majority of the homeowners are no longer interested, we will take the appropriate steps.
Joe,
As I mentioned, I am no longer in support of the sprinkler system!
First, I find it unusal that all the homes surrounding the outlots are no longer supporting a water hook up to their homes. These homes were in fact the instigators of the sprinkler system. Now suddenly we require a city water hook up with a significant cost increase. This smells like a "bait and switch" scheme. Once the neighborhood is commited and initially expensed, the sprinkler momentum will surely continue.
Secondly, the upfront costs have increased 60 percent, besides the increased yearly dues. We refer to this as "project creep" in the business environment. Not only is this an unsatisfactory surprise, we should probably expect even more financial surprises if this project were to continue. We are inexperienced and potential surprises can always arise.
Thirdly, we have additional expenditures looming on the horizon which must still be budgeted. The trails require mainatenance to prevent what has occurred with The Fields and their trail neglect. At this time the septic system appears in financial shape but as we are aware, The Fields representatives are inexperienced manageing a septic system and this could erupt as a future problem. We need to build a reserve.
However, I am open to landscaping ideas outside of the sprinkler system which will improve our present situation e.g. drought resistent grass, shade trees, etc.
I am available for questions and look forward to the meeting.
Regards,
Ron Ibarra