Ok,
The City of Milfor has Annexed our development. Therefore there is the allowment of taxation in order to have representation.
When the lots were flooded and not mowed, the City came to our rescue. The city will also snowplow the roads, mow the common areas, and pay for the street lights. Is this correct?
If so, I would question the need for a HOA at all. Really, is it necessary? If deemed necessary, it is appropriate?
I would think that the HOA and the City would have a relationship since some issues surely cross boundaries.Who is the current contact for the Board on issues such as architectural, structural, and landscape?
I would like to invite the Mayor of Milford and other City officials to our meeting in Sept.. Does anyone object? Is the meeting an open forum or only for members who have paid the dues?
I believe certain officials in Milford are questioning our HOA and the legality of an annual due, and I would like to see what type of arguement is addressed.
If we pay the city taxes and are serviced by the city, I do not think the HOA/board should exist. Although I have supported them on numerous issues I would challenge the need for thier existence once the homeowners hear what types of services the City of Milford supplies us.
The topic came up today and I found it very interesting and disturbing at the same time.