Yes

Yes, they should hold an election without further ado. No,I don't want them wasting my dues going after Gammon. The BOD could have simply agreed to the relief the lawsuit sought, but instead forced litigation.

Pay UP!

1. The Board of Directors should hold an election when most of the residents of Circle C are in town...not during the summer when alot of people are on vacation. School just started back. Let's give it a little time.

2. YES, Mr. Gammon ought to have the pay the expenses for the Circle C lawyers fees we endured because of his frivolous lawsuit. In fact, at the CHOA meeting a lot of residents brought this up to the attorney that was speaking to us telling us why we were not allowed to have the election. Even more residents asked how he was able to sue Circle C Homeowners on behalf of the Circle C Homeowners without permission. If people had to pay lawyers fees for the defendants that they bring into a lawsuit, I'll be willing to bet there would be a lot fewer frivolous suits as well! It would sure help anyway!

Get Your Head Out, Sal

Justice Spector specifically ruled that Ken Rigsbee and Jim O?’Reilly are lawfully serving as directors at this time, the contracts entered into by the CCHOA during their tenure are all valid, and neither Ken Rigsbee nor Jim O?’Reilly are required to stand for re-election until their seats come up for election in the normal course of the CCHOA?’s business.

Justice Spector ruled on various other issues at the hearing including the following:

1) Justice Spector ruled that Mr. Gammon represents only himself and no other members of the CCCHOA. Mr. Gammon, however, indicated that he intends to amend his pleadings and add other members of the CCHOA, but he cannot claim that he represents the members of the CCHOA as a whole.

2) Justice Spector granted the CCHOA?’s requests for summary judgment on the issues raised and addressed by Judge Meurer in her letter ruling, namely:

a) The nominations procedure used for the March election was valid.

b) The CCHOA had the right to issue and use unique proxies as the only valid proxies for the election.

c) The Directors had not improperly used funds of the CCHOA.

d) The communications between the CCHOA and its attorneys are privileged.

I stand by my post.

Not only do I stand by what I posted here, but I back it up with my name.

Everything I posted here is true.

And, if you like the idea of gambling with tens of thousands of dollars of our CCHOA money, maybe you are actually one of the BOD. Maybe you're one of the BOD and you've been using the many different Anonymous names we find here at this website. Who knows.

I do know the difference between you and me, I have a backbone (I use my name) and you don't.