|
|
Are we a GO now?
I'm glad to hear that BF is satisfied with the decisions of Wednesday. If BF is happy with the ballot wording, that might mean there will be no appeal to the Supreme Court for more changes. I think any appeal must be filed by Monday. And if no appeal is filed - we're off and running.
By ww
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Chris
I have a copy of what Broomfield submitted. I am knowledgeable. I know what the title setting board did. Broomfield got just about everything they wanted. If anybody got "knots in their shorts," it was CVELG.
P.I.A.? Call me whatever you like. I'm not going away. But, I will never call you such names. I will challenge what you are doing because I think it is very wrong. That is my right. In my opinion, you did not do well at the hearing.
By BBW
|
|
|
to bbw
First, I do not appreciate your attacks, if you can't be nice, then LEAVE!! Why should I tell you what I have learned, your certainly not sharing much information. You have eluded the question WW and I have both asked about what happens to the releasees if they have no ride or how are the transported to the nearest bus stop. Remember, the first site was a 1/2 mile not 1 1/2!!
By cheryl
|
|
|
To BBW
This is a discussion contiued from the last board.
First, if all areas rolled over and let governments do as they please they would all take the easy way out-not the right way. All areas do act like Countryside when a development is thrust into their neighborhoods. As for your suggestion to ask BF why, so they can spout more propaganda. I do not wish to be part of BF lies. BF has lied-or at least bent the truth as far as they could. No one who was to be directly affected by the jail has ever been notified of their decision or offered the chance to have input into the site selection process-even though they tell the media a different story!
By Tony
|
