To BBW: Public Participation
Let me clarify my understanding of the directions of participation in a city council meeting; direct from the web page of the City of Broomfield:
Directions for citizen comments:
Under this section of the meeting citizens of BF have an oportunity to comment on items not on the agenda. This is the time for residents to ask about something involving the city; or to request that the City Council consider making or changing a policy.(Not on the web..Comments are limited to 3 minutes)
City Manager's Report: City Manager reports on amy adminsistraative items which the City Council may need information on.
This is valid for two reasons in reference to the County:
First mention of 1998 ballot issue: 02/24/98, City managers report: City Council directed staff to proceed with the procedures to initiate the ballot question for November 1998 election.
This was not part of the agenda. This action was part of the city managers report..are we to assume this is an "administrative item which the council may need information on?" Why is this not part of the agenda?
03/10/98 City Manager's report: City Manager reviewed his 03/09/98 memorandum sent to council. Manager indicated his intention as a private ciitzen to file the language with the Colorado Legislative Council for City and County of Broomfield ballot.
Again, is this an administrative item which the council may need information on?
Is this on the agenda? Hell no. Was either decision made public on the agenda so that citizen input may be viable? No. Who, besides the council and the city managerment even knew that a county ballot was being considered?
By Br Anonymous
Let me clarify my understanding of the directions of participation in a city council meeting; direct from the web page of the City of Broomfield:
Directions for citizen comments:
Under this section of the meeting citizens of BF have an oportunity to comment on items not on the agenda. This is the time for residents to ask about something involving the city; or to request that the City Council consider making or changing a policy.(Not on the web..Comments are limited to 3 minutes)
City Manager's Report: City Manager reports on amy adminsistraative items which the City Council may need information on.
This is valid for two reasons in reference to the County:
First mention of 1998 ballot issue: 02/24/98, City managers report: City Council directed staff to proceed with the procedures to initiate the ballot question for November 1998 election.
This was not part of the agenda. This action was part of the city managers report..are we to assume this is an "administrative item which the council may need information on?" Why is this not part of the agenda?
03/10/98 City Manager's report: City Manager reviewed his 03/09/98 memorandum sent to council. Manager indicated his intention as a private ciitzen to file the language with the Colorado Legislative Council for City and County of Broomfield ballot.
Again, is this an administrative item which the council may need information on?
Is this on the agenda? Hell no. Was either decision made public on the agenda so that citizen input may be viable? No. Who, besides the council and the city managerment even knew that a county ballot was being considered?
By Br Anonymous