Ah yes, the old communist/socialist/radical ploy of attacking the messenger, while ignoring the facts.  What I presented is a paper that contains many "facts".  If you can't dispute them, you are wasting my time.

By the way, like I said oh petulant one, I won't do anymore research for your lazy butt.  That was it, now do it yourself.

Also, by addressing BB, I assume you believe he and I are the same person????  If so, you are very very wrong.   I'm a retired older guy living right here in Muscatine and I know for a fact that he's younger, still working, and travels a lot.

So get that out of your head.  We conservatives don't normally obfuscate and present ourselves as someone else like you radical libs.  Don't need to.

First off, according to the standard set forth by BigBrother, if you answer to any name someone calls you it must be fact. Therefore?

If you don't like the rules set forth by Bigbrother, I suggest you talk with the master debater himself. I think this could be funny when some calls someone a really bad word.

Mal and TP - BB kept insisting that it was not he and you two kept addressing the posts to him on the subject even tho HiR insisted that it was he. Let's stop the petty bickering over this non-argument.

Mal, when HiR presented his thesis on lower taxes, he presented the research to support that thesis - that's what you do. Opposing views are then free to do their own research and present the material that supports that view.

Again I believe this to be incorrect, but will agree on the pettiness from some. We also have that thing called honesty to worry about.