To all that have responded to my posting...
My message was not to criticize or censor your comments or requests of the Mayor, Commissioners, or anyone else for that matter. All of the requests that I have seen have been valid, and we as residents are entitled to the information. The point that I am trying to get across is that there are ways to request infomation as well as to follow-up on requests aside from some of the behaviors displayed. We can have discussion as well as debates regarding the issues, but I personally wish that they would be more constructive without the level of sarcasm. It is a distinct possibility that there would be more input from our residents via the website if they are not personally attacked as soon as something is posted.
I am all for doing things to benefit our neighborhood and hope that as a team, we can change things for the better.
Dear Disheartened,
I had somehow missed your comeback until this morning. What do you not get about Freedom of Speech? You are STILL trying to dictate how to utilize that freedom. Very simply put, you are totally out of line! Ways? Surely you jest! Each of us is free to demand information from our elected officials if necessary - PERIOD! Freedom of Speech is unconditional with two exceptions (that should keep you bust looking that up if you are truly objective, NOT!).
The reason there is not more input from residents is because larryl and the commissioners do not listen unless we attend their performance aka meeting and because they do what the h--- they want to do: case in point; Beautification Ordinance, lack of law enforcement, refusing to dialogue with residents except one hour a month, dictatorial assignment of responsibilites on the Commission, and more.
This archaic lack of transparency in our Little Tree City government has got to go and if it takes demands, sarcasm, insolence, yelling, blistering posts, knashing of teeth, wailing, petitions, rebellion, or whatever means within the law to do it, so be it. This spending tax money on private property even for the public good has got to go because the term "public good" is subject to interpretation and larryl and the Commission use their own definition as it needs to be regardless of public outcry. This snail-paced response to real problems has got to go! This "checking on it" response to legitimate resident concerns has got to go! Three of these Commissioners and larryl have got to go! Posts attempting to limit Freedom of Speech can stay because even as out of line as you are, you have the right to say it. You just do not have the right to tell me what I can and can not do. Thank you.