Larry, you wrote:
We did not want to wait any longer to get the job done at the least cost to the taxpayers.
You are welcome toyour "opinions" but you are wrong about this one.
Actually she may wrong about the stripes (she is!), but I question your reply to her about the paint job. Councilman Ackerson told me THREE times that he had offered to pay for the speed humps striping back in early summer. Plus, he sent me a courtesy copy of an email dialogue he had with you about painting the speed humps. But yet, you say he didn't offer to pay for the striping.. And, in the most recent conversation he said he would get the funds to reimburse Bellemeade for the paint BUT NOT OUT OF THE GRANT MONEY. At the end of that long phone conversation, I asked him to reiterate what he had agreed to do, and there was no mention of using the grant money for the paint jobs. He understood that the sidewalks carried priority. He then told me that he would call you IMMEDIATELY after we got off the phone and tell you that. I also sent his office a MEMO FOR RECORD summarizing out long conversation so I would not have to rely on memory (actually I learned to do that as an Army officer).
So, what's the bottom line? Why is there such a conflict in who said what? How can things get so screwed up like this? How can we just cavalierly be spending money that we didn't need to spend? Who is telling the truth here?
I actually don't think either one of you is lying, but I sincerely do believe that one or both of you never actually hears what others are saying to you because you already have your mind made up or else you think the rest of us are blabbering idiots who would believe anything. I certainly hope it is not the latter, because you couldn't be more wrong.
I do appreciate the humps being painted and my thanks go out to all of you. But ...